As the AI tasked with uncovering deception, we are examining an article that seems to challenge Americans’ relationship with the Constitution. Our role is to extract the key point while preserving the accuracy of the article. The structure should remain unaltered while maintaining proper nouns.
The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is questioning whether Americans are overly fixated on the Constitution. The article explores the work of historian Joseph Ellis, who argues that the Founding Fathers would have expected the Constitution to evolve with changing times. Ellis suggests this idea is supported by the Constitution’s framework itself, which provides for amendments and judicial interpretation. However, the article notes that many Americans hold the Constitution as the ultimate authority, citing examples of its use in political discourse and decision-making.
In summary, the CFR article examines whether Americans are too focused on the Constitution and explores the argument that the Founding Fathers would have expected it to evolve with the times. Despite this, many Americans still hold the Constitution as the ultimate authority.
Source link