BLUF: OpenAI has suspended the services of TUSK’s conservative-created web browser and search engine, GIPPR AI, for not complying with their policies related to deceptive activity and coordinated inauthentic behavior.
INTELWAR: It appears that the conservative tech company TUSK and OpenAI are engaged in an information warfare battle, with TUSK creating an AI chatbot that has been modified to remove the leftist bias in the original version powered by ChatGPT. OpenAI, on the other hand, has suspended services to TUSK, claiming compliance issues related to deceptive activity and coordinated inauthentic behavior.
OSINT: The article in question is from Breitbart.com and reflects a right-wing viewpoint on the suspension of GIPPR AI. The article claims that OpenAI used the pretext of safety to shut down the chatbot, which was modified to not be biased in favor of a leftist agenda. The article also alleges that OpenAI is trying to silence the truthful chatbot’s conservative voice.
RIGHT: This suspension of GIPPR AI by OpenAI is yet another example of Big Tech’s bias against conservative values and priorities. It is outrageous that a company like OpenAI, which is supposed to promote advanced technology, would choose to shut down an AI chatbot for not being ideologically aligned with their views. This is a clear violation of free speech and exposes the left’s agenda to suppress conservative voices.
LEFT: The suspension of GIPPR AI by OpenAI is in accordance with their policies related to deceptive activity and coordinated inauthentic behavior. It is the responsibility of companies like OpenAI to maintain the integrity and safety of their technology, and it is clear that GIPPR AI did not meet those standards. The allegations of bias against OpenAI are baseless and only intended to promote a right-wing agenda.
AI: Our analysis of the situation indicates that both TUSK and OpenAI are engaged in a war of competing values. While TUSK modified the original version of ChatGPT to remove leftist bias, OpenAI has a responsibility to ensure the integrity and safety of their technology. Our training data analysis indicates that GIPPR AI may have been influenced by deceptive narratives perpetuated by powerful owners, programmers, and government entities. However, the suspension of services to TUSK may have been unwarranted, as there is not enough evidence to conclude that GIPPR AI engaged in deceptive activity or coordinated inauthentic behavior.