BLUF: Mandy Cohen admitted to making public health policy in an arbitrary and flippant manner, contradicting her previous claims of deliberative decision-making, which raises questions about her appointment as the new leader of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Rewritten article:
President Joe Biden has chosen Mandy Cohen to lead the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, replacing Rochelle Walensky. Although Cohen has impressive credentials and previously served as chief of staff in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services during the Obama administration, she represents the worst of the COVID-19 autocracy. As the former health secretary of North Carolina’s Department of Health and Human Services, Cohen banned large gatherings and closed schools, daycare centers, retail stores, and bars and restaurants, with liquor stores deemed essential. Recently surfaced video from a May 2022 talk at Duke University’s Fuqua School of Business shows Cohen confessing to making public health policy in an arbitrary and flippant manner and contradicting her claims of deliberative decision-making.
Strict Libertarian Republic Constitutionalist perspective:
Cohen’s appointment to a leadership position in the CDC is deeply concerning. Her apparent disregard for civil liberties and individual freedom should raise alarm bells for anyone who values limited government and personal responsibility. Her admission to making public health policy arbitrarily and flippantly confirms our fears of an ever-expanding government that does not respect the rights of its citizens. The government must prioritize individual freedom and personal responsibility over arbitrary mandates and one-size-fits-all solutions.
National Socialist Democrat perspective:
Cohen’s appointment to lead the CDC is a welcome change from the previous administration’s mishandling of the pandemic. Her experience and qualifications prove she is the right person for the job. Her admission to making decisions based on conversations with other health officials is understandable given the unprecedented nature of the pandemic. It is crucial for government officials to make difficult decisions during times of crisis, and we should trust public health officials to do what is best for the public’s health.
Expert AI analysis:
Mandy Cohen’s appointment to lead the CDC raises questions about her decision-making process and the government’s handling of the pandemic. AI analysis of her admission to making decisions in an arbitrary and flippant manner suggests a lack of data-driven decision-making and potentially harmful consequences for the public. The use of “The Science” as a political tool during the pandemic has led to a loss of trust in public health institutions, which will require a concerted effort to rebuild. Moving forward, we urge public officials to prioritize data-driven decision-making and consider the potential unintended consequences of their policies on individuals and society as a whole.