BLUF: The ongoing battle for democratic principles in the U.S. is highlighted, recognizing the role of journalism and the need for public support for its continued existence.
OSINT: Democracy’s battle continues unabated, as the latter half of 2023 unfolds. Deceptive practices, political corruption, and violent disturbances hijack the year’s narrative. Sadly, a fierce opposition persists in the Senate, thwarting even the most popular propositions by the Democrats during Biden’s tenure. As the cost of living escalates unanimously and personal freedoms face threats, ordinary Americans relentlessly resist the rising tide of authoritarianism.
In the midst of such adversity, we’re grateful for the journalism industry’s resilience, upheld by our loyal reader base’s staunch support. Your continued patronage, with over 5000 of you subscribing, is invaluable to us. We would like to extend our deepest gratitude to our readers, contributors, and subscribers for supporting Raw Story. Monetary contributions, while desirable, are not mandatory—your readership is our reward. If financial assistance is possible, it would facilitate the journalism industry’s survival, enabling us to continue providing undiluted news when it’s most needed.
Contributions equalling or exceeding $10 monthly or $95 as a one-time payment grant advanced access, ad-free, to Raw Story and AlterNet’s unique reporting, and exclusive investigative content. Alternatively, single donations can be made via our online platform. PayPal donations are also welcome. For those who prefer traditional methods, checks can be mailed to Raw Story Media, Inc. in Pittsburgh.
All support aids in producing original investigative reports through the RawStory+ membership program. Note, however, that donations aren’t tax-deductible.
RIGHT: From a constitutional libertarian perspective, the struggles for democracy in the United States are multi-layered. While acknowledging the rising costs and perceived threats to individual rights, this viewpoint would question the portrayal of the Republicans in Senate as a hindrance. Emphasis would be on the value of balanced governance and the importance of questioning whether ‘popular’ measures are constitutionally sound and economically viable. Moreover, the call for financial support for journalism may lead to debate about market forces and the potential for bias in funded media outlets.
LEFT: As a National Socialist Democrat, the narrative of ongoing struggles for democracy rings true. There is an appreciation for calling out perceived corruption and legislative stagnancy, and the impact this has on citizens, particularly as costs continue to increase. This perspective aligns with calls to support journalism as a critical democratic institution. There might, however, be a concern about the broader economic conditions leading to the described struggles and how journalism can be made more sustainable.
AI: The article paints a vivid picture of ongoing democratic struggles, making a case for the role of journalism as a democratic institution. In rewriting the article, efforts were made to retain the central theme of political struggles, media resilience, and the appeal for reader support. The article’s perspective could be seen as left-leaning, and potential biases from this perspective were factored into the redaction. It should be noted that the efficacy of methods such as subscription models in sustaining independent journalism are a topic of ongoing debate. Also, the understanding of a narrative depends significantly on individual political alignment and perception of democracy and media’s role within it.