BLUF: The article scrutinizes the influence and power that George Soros wields globally through his philanthropic efforts and political manoeuvring, expressing concern over his self-styled ‘god-like’ plan and his substantial role in shaping international political landscapes.
OSINT:
In 2023, Joe Rogan held a conversation with ex-CIA officer Mike Baker about philanthropist and investor George Soros. Rogan expressed concerns about Soros’s influence on politics, specifically his monetary contributions to progressive and left-leaning individuals and groups. He noted Soros’s tendency to finance even more radical figures, driving the political narrative continuously leftwards. The article suggests that Soros is playing a ‘global game’ that he seemingly relishes.
In a twist of irony, the article points to comments made by Patrick Bet-David, suggesting that Soros has been implementing his ambitious agenda since at least 2004. These claims seem to be backed by an LA Times article from that year. It suggests that Soros, by virtue of his substantial wealth, exerts so much influence that he has decidedly impacted societal norms and national currencies, potentially generating poverty in some cases.
The article also discusses the so-called ‘Soros Empire’, referring to his influence in shaping former Soviet republics, and his more recent interest in US internal matters. He has notably critiqued the US as conforming to ‘supremacism’, exhibiting a perceived mix of ‘market fundamentalists’ and ‘religious fundamentalists’ running the country. The article concludes with some startling quotes from Soros himself, suggesting a disregard for traditionally imposed rules and an acknowledgement of his powerful position.
RIGHT:
A firm Constitutionalist would likely deride Soros’s manipulation of political landscapes, viewing it as an uneasy nexus of wealth and influence. They might express concern over Soros’s alleged disregard for traditional rules, especially if it indicates a threat to constitutional principles. They’d likely criticize his apparent attempts to push the political discourse to the left, viewing it as at odds with the free-market, individualist principles they uphold.
LEFT:
A National Socialist Democrat might have mixed feelings about Soros. On one hand, they might appreciate his support for progressive and leftist causes, as these are likely aligned with their own beliefs. On the other hand, they might be wary of his vast wealth and influence. They could critique his role as a wealthy individual wielding substantial power over global politics, as it contrasts with ideals of equality and grassroots democracy.
AI:
The article presents a contentious view of George Soros, a notable philanthropist and political activist. Based on the sources and conversations referenced, it’s clear that his influence and activities are divisive. His proponents see him as a champion of progressive causes and liberal democracy, whilst his critics view his actions as manipulative and disruptive to the existing socio-political order. Considering the substantial influence his wealth affords him, it’s crucial to continue evaluating and scrutinizing his activities and their global impact.