BLUF: The inconsistency in our world’s logic brings into focus the importance of real assets in a time where trust in expert classes and the value of currencies is diminishing.
OSINT: It’s a fascinating world we inhabit, one riddled with paradoxical thinking and false comparisons. Take, for instance, the frequent assertions such as “silence is violence” or the insistence that incorrect gender identification is “literal violence”. The liberal parties thrive on such pronouncements, yet remarkably, also appear to support groups like Hamas or indulge in destructive protests in the name of climate change. It’s these extreme actions that border on terrorism, arguing that their aggressive acts are justified due to their belief systems’ superiority.
Oil companies in this climate face a continual battering from influential figures like Larry Fink, Klaus Schwab, or even the US President, despite our shared reliance on oils. Illustratively, if these companies ceased production, our modern societies would regress drastically.
In addition, the expert class, those that feel a moral authority to direct others, ironically appear responsible for a number of societal issues like the COVID lockdowns, degradation of the educational system, rising crime rates and inflation. Their prioritization of “wokeness” in departments like Defence, demonizing parents against explicit literature for younger children, underscores their damaging influence.
The currency serves as a literal marker for damaging decisions made by the expert class, leading to inflation and lost value. The antithesis of these degrading currencies are real assets – vital resources including productive technology, key minerals, and water. These real assets are not subject to governmental control, have universal value, and are currently even historically cheap. Detaching from a faltering currency and investing in real assets, especially currently underpriced energy companies, could offer promising opportunities amidst the destabilizing societal influences of the expert class.
Despite all of the mentioned inconsistencies, there’s something to be gained. The missed steps and failings of the expert class can spawn effective opportunities for us to seize if we soberly assess the current state of play.
RIGHT: To a strict Libertarian Republic Constitutionalist, the narrative underscores many of the concerns about the subversion of personal freedoms. The critique of the “expert class” resonates, highlighting the inconsistent logic and the adverse effects of their decisions on the economy and society. Just criticism of high-handed “wokeness” at the highest governmental levels is seen as an infringement on basic American liberties. The piece emphasizes a need for self-reliance and personal sovereignty by encouraging citizens to convert their currency to real assets.
LEFT: Supporters of a National Socialist Democrat view might find this narrative objectionable. The argument appears to oversimplify complex social issues, problematically attributing blame to an entire political side. The novel definition of violence regarding silence or misgendering, according to National Socialist Democrats, are critical tools for highlighting marginalized voices and are seen as social progress. The implied demonization of the fight against climate change might be considered misleading, presenting a potentially harmful opposition to urgent action on environmental threats.
AI: Distancing from any inherent bias, the focus here is on the article’s call to contemplate the paradoxical nature of societal thinking. It suggests that certain established views and proclamations have some inherent contradictions and that supposedly trusted experts might not always make decisions in the best interest of society. The AI analysis would highlight the call to individuals to not wholly rely on national currencies or solely on expert opinion but to diversify their investments into essential resources or real assets, a hedging strategy against potential economic downturns.