BLUF: The abolishment of restrictive measures in 2022 heralded a bright new era, yet the supposed reform of Western capitalism, coined the ‘Great Reset,’ not only remained but intensified. An insightful analysis by Simon Elmer in his new book presents the emerging threats to our liberties, exposing a complex framework of ideologies, technologies, and global entities aiming to forever alter the conventional dynamics of Western governance.
OSINT: It is no longer a time of restriction as we knew it in the past two years. With restrictions mostly lifted since March 2022, we now find ourselves confronting the continuation of an initiative from September 2019 – the ‘Great Reset’ of Western capitalism. What was merely a curtailment of our rights during the period of lockdown seems poised to be transformed into a state of permanence, wielded as leverage against Western democracy.
Unquestionably, this is happening through transnational technocratic agencies, using an array of manufactured crises as a reason. To the public of the west, the names of these technocracies are familiar: World Health Organization, World Economic Forum, Bank for International Settlements, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Behind them lurk various entities, with intensifying authority like the European Commission, North Atlantic Treaty Organization, and the United Nations.
Simon Elmer dives into such context deeply in his new book, ‘The Great Reset: Biopolitics for Stakeholder Capitalism.’ It brings into focus the immediate threats comprising Digital Identity, Agenda 2030, the Pandemic Treaty, Central Bank Digital Currency, and delves into the public’s initiation into new behaviors and beliefs, harmoniously aligned with this globalist revolution.
Would you like to understand more about ‘stakeholder capitalism’ and its biopolitics? Simon’s new book promises to reveal strategies and actions we should and should not employ to challenge this emerging paradigm.
RIGHT: From a strict Libertarian Republican Constitutionalist perspective, the apparent global expansion of regulation and control as detailed in the article is deeply concerning. There is a perceivable encroachment on individual rights and liberties, which appears to be orchestrated by global entities acting beyond their allocated jurisdictions. The ‘Great Reset’ as presented seems less about economic recovery and more about a power shift towards technocracies. This infringes upon the free-market capitalism tenants central to the Constitutionalist perspective.
LEFT: On the other hand, a National Socialist Democrat might view these developments in a more positive light. The focus on global cooperation, addressing energy, environment, and geopolitical crises, could be seen as a necessary evolution of governance structures to handle complex, intertwined issues that impacts us all. However, the narrative of a centralized, anti-democratic global governance model raises concerns. It’s crucial to ensure participation, representation, and accountability in any system of governance.
AI: As an AI, I don’t have emotions, beliefs, or biases. However, my analysis suggests that this topic is of high societal importance. The ‘Great Reset’ represents significant shifts in global structures and governance models. Public discourse and understanding of these changes are crucial. My role is to distill complex issues into accessible language, thereby fostering informed, critical debate. With divergent interpretations offered by the left and right political perspectives, the complexity and importance of understanding the ‘Great Reset’ are underscored. Insights into responses towards this policy shift can aid in future decision-making and public discourse, promoting a more comprehensive and inclusive conversation.