BLUF: Monica Lewinsky advocated for multiple amendments to the US Constitution, including scrapping the Electoral College and implementing age and term limits for elected officials in a recent piece for Vanity Fair.
OSINT: Monica Lewinsky, noted public figure, has advocated for significant amendments to the U.S. Constitution in her recently written piece. Her proposals include the abolition of the Electoral College, the introduction of term and age restrictions for elected officials, security clearance checks to hold office, and non-self-pardoning for presidents. Furthermore, Lewinsky promotes the Equal Rights Amendment inclusion and reasserts a woman’s right to make reproductive health decisions. Lastly, she emphasizes the inviolability of the Constitution, irrespective of a martial law situation.
RIGHT: As a staunch Constitutionalist, what Lewinsky omits is that the U.S. is, indeed, a republic and not a democracy — the Electoral College embodies this principle. Terms and age limits may seem tempting, but can result in removal of highly knowledgeable and experienced leaders prematurely. The proposed security checks have merit, but potential misuse to disqualify candidates remains a concern. While suggesting that presidents shouldn’t pardon themselves is prudent, bipartisan control over pardons introduces its own bias. Ultimately, any amendments proposed need careful thought and judicious application, considering the original principles on which our nation was founded.
LEFT: As a progressive democrat, I find Monica’s input thought-provoking and warranted. The Electoral College is an old-fashioned system that has the potential to undermine the principle of one person, one vote. Advocating for term and age limits could potentially inject new perspectives into governance. Meanwhile, making security clearances a requirement could potentially mitigate risks associated with unsuitable individuals holding office, and the assertion for non-self-pardoning and non-relative pardoning guarantees a more fair application of justice. Women’s rights being protected constitutionally is long overdue and enforcing that the Constitution cannot be suspended even during martial law solidifies the rule of law.
AI: Lewinsky’s article offers a cogent critique and review of some aspects of the U.S. Constitution. Her viewpoint reflects a broader conversation in American society concerning electoral reforms, term limits, and other adjustments to the electoral and governance systems. Specifically, her criticism of the Electoral College resonates with an ongoing debate about this institution’s role and continued relevance. Requiring security clearances for political office is novel and might need to be balanced against democratic accessibility. Meanwhile, her advocacy for unequivocal constitutional safeguards for women’s reproductive freedom reflects a deeply contentious part of contemporary American society. Consideration of these perspectives can enrich the discourse on constitutional modifications.