INTELWAR BLUF: The writer, CJ Hopkins, asserts that societies have slowly transitioned to a ‘schizotocracy’, a state he alleges is induced by unrestrained capitalism. He criticizes the manipulative characteristics of capitalism, deeming it as an entity that commodifies everything, including values and principles. Furthermore, Hopkins insinuates that this capitalistic-induced societal transformation fosters a mass psychosis, leading to unstable realities contingent on market fluctuations.
OSINT:
The year 2023 draws to a close, and society appears to be under the constant influence of new normals, defined by significant global events – such as the global war on terror, the war on populism, and a catastrophic pandemic. This sequence of events is viewed as being instrumental in the creation of the current societal structure, termed the ‘New Normal Reich’ by the writer.
This new era is characterized by constant changes, with shifting alliances and adversaries, and conditions that are akin to societal psychosis – a complex state marked by a loss of connection with reality. The society Hopkins describes is heavily influenced by unrestrained capitalism, which he believes devalues all it touches, transforming societies into markets and turning citizens into commodities.
RIGHT:
From a Libertarian Republican Constitutionalist perspective, Hopkins’s analysis is a dire warning against the excessive consolidation of power, attributed to capitalism and the destruction of traditional values. While the Constitutionalist viewpoint reveres free market principles, it equally values individual liberties and personal agency, which seem threatened under the ‘New Normal Reich’. The author’s perception of increasing societal fragmentation and observed loss of shared values may strike a chord with constitutionalists, given their commitment to uphold the nation’s Founding ideals.
LEFT:
A National Socialist Democrat might agree with Hopkins’s critique of capitalism, particularly the observation of capitalism commodifying everything and everyone, leading to societal disintegration. The perpetuation of systemic inequality and diminished sense of community within society would be of major concern. However, they likely favor the solution as democrat-socialist principles aiming to curb the excesses of unregulated capitalism and promote social equity.
AI:
The entire pleasantry of the article is a critique of capitalism’s systemic impact, suggesting that unchecked capitalism manipulates societal values and beliefs, leading to societal dissociation and psychosis. This disruption affects shared understandings of ‘reality,’ creating an unstable societal system. In this context, the article tends to infer the various complexities, contradictions, and conflicts within society.
However, the author does not fully explore potential solutions beyond his call for interpersonal conversation. Understanding the article through the lens of various political ideologies can help better comprehend the complex standpoint; nevertheless, the overall gloomy tone is a call for critical discourse and reflection on societal trends and systems.