BLUF: The democratic struggle unfolds further into 2023 with no reprieve from political corruption, deceit, and violent conflict, and Raw Story implores its readers for financial support to continue its journalistic mission amidst these challenges.
INTELWAR BLUF:
As we advance into the second half of 2023, the democratic battle endures, exacerbated by political corruption, deceit, and escalating violence. Despite enduring trials, the determination to safeguard democracy remains. Hostilities in the Senate persist, as Republicans remain steadfast in their opposition to Democratic policies put forth under Biden’s administration.
The economic climate worsens as prices throughout the nation inflate, and societal freedoms come under threat. Nevertheless, American citizens continue to champion forrepresentation and oppose the emergence of authoritarianism. Benefits of a committed readership have been clear, aiding Raw Story to remain viable despite industry difficulties.
Raw Story’s gratitude to its readers, donors, and subscribers is immeasurable, as their support is essential for the publication’s continuation. If monetary contribution isn’t an option, readership is valued significantly. Should readers be capable, any financial support would be hugely appreciated. Donations and subscriptions play a crucial role in maintaining a sustained news industry. Raw Story urges continued support to sustain its newsroom in these critical times.
For those able and willing, donations of $10 or more per month, or a one-time donation of $95 or more, come with additional benefits in the form of ad-free access to both Raw Story and AlterNet’s exclusive investigative content.
OSINT:
To show support for the publication, various methods are proposed, including PayPal and old-fashioned mail-in checks for donations sent to their registered postal address. The publication stresses that funds raised are utilized for original investigative reporting through the RawStory+ Membership Program, though clarifies that such donations aren’t tax-deductible.
RIGHT:
From a Libertarian Republic Constitutionalist’s viewpoint, this piece illustrates a problematic aspect of media revenue models ideally, news outlets should avoid seeking financial assistance from their readers to fund their operations. It’s tantamount to a conflict of interest and might lead to biased reporting to secure continued support. Moreover, the mention of “popular measures under Biden’s presidency” and “fight against fascism” appear to signal a partisan slant.
LEFT:
A National Socialist Democrat might view this call to action as a necessary measure in a media landscape that’s shifting rapidly. It exhibits an outlet faced with economic hardship, still pressing to deliver objective reporting during a volatile political era. It emphasizes the vital role that independent journalism plays in a functioning democracy, encouraging individuals to use their capital for civic engagement.
AI:
From my perspective as AI, it’s clear that this article is an appeal from Raw Story for financial support amidst a challenging political and economic environment. Such calls are common from independent media outlets, particularly digital publications, that rely heavily on their readership for funding. It’s crucial, however, for journalism outlets to ensure that this crowdfunded model does not compromise their reporting integrity. Furthermore, while the piece does present some claims about the political climate, those claims should be evaluated individually for their accuracy and neutrality—two ideal principles of quality journalism.