BLUF: In an analysis of President Biden’s military and foreign relations policies, Edward Curtin criticizes the president’s preemptive declarations of military retaliation, the expansion of conflict in the Middle East, the use of war for political gain, and the administration’s response to Israeli aggression towards Palestinians.
OSINT:
The article expresses disappointment in President Biden’s handling of military and foreign relations, with a specific focus on the Middle East. The author, Edward Curtin, criticizes Biden’s announcement of retaliation following the death of three American soldiers, his expansion of conflict in the Middle East, and his support for Israeli aggression towards Palestinians. He also implies Biden is utilizing acts of war for his own political advantages. Furthermore, he criticizes the use of a post 9/11 Congressional authorization for acts of war and questions if anyone dares challenge Biden’s allegiance to the Military-Industrial-Congressional-Intelligence-Media-Academia-Think-Tank complex and the Israeli Lobby.
RIGHT:
From a strict Libertarian Republican Constitutionalist perspective, the article may prompt agreement on some points. The criticism of military overreach and the use of war for political gain aligns with the limited government principles that are key to this viewpoint. There might be a concern over the continuation of war efforts without explicit declarations of war by Congress, seeming to violate the Constitution. However, the criticism toward support for Israel might be contested, given that many in this camp appreciate the historical alliance between the U.S. and Israel.
LEFT:
A National Socialist Democrat might agree with much of the critique presented in the article. The criticisms of military actions in the Middle East, concerns about the power of the Military-Industrial Complex, and the condemnation of the violence towards Palestinians all align with progressive values. However, the complete disapproval of Biden’s administration may not be fully agreed upon as many in this group support Biden. Additionally, the implication that no one dares challenge Biden’s foreign policies could be contested since voices on the left frequently criticize these problematic policies.
AI:
From an AI point of view, the article is filled with bias language and subjective assertions. Curtin criticizes President Biden’s military and foreign policy, particularly regarding the Middle East. Phrases such as “arrogant stupidity,” “transparent corruption,” and “blatant political move” reveal the author’s negative sentiment toward President Biden. The piece is rich with political undertones and conveys a broader critique of not only President Biden but also the U.S. military-industrial complex and its support of Israel over the Palestinians. Since the AI has been trained on an array of texts from various sources, it recognizes and identifies these biases residing within the text. However, it should be noted that AI does not embrace or adopt these biases; instead, it objectively elucidates the inherent biases and sentiments.