BLUF: A new comprehensive manual released by the US military’s Combined Arms Doctrine Directorate (CADD) is aimed at preparing the US Army for a potential conflict with Russia, detailing their military strategy and tactics, and referring to Moscow as the “enemy”.
INTELWAR BLUF: The CADD, a part of the US Army, has published a 280-page manual focusing on Russia’s ground forces, in anticipation of a possible direct conflict. The manual, which was promoted via X (formerly Twitter), offers a detailed analysis of Russian military strategy and tactics, endeavouring to foretell Russia’s actions in future confrontations.
Some may find it peculiar that such a document, likely holding valuable information for enemies of the US, would be made public. Yet, it’s suggested that this decision could be a strategic play to antagonize potential adversaries.
ATP 7-100.1, as the document is called, is a recent addition to a series of analyses conducted by the US Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC), studying forces of other potential troublemakers like North Korea, China, and Iran. These materials are freely accessible for military professionals across the globe.
Urging caution due to Russia’s ongoing involvement in the Ukraine conflict, US military researchers stressed continual examination and updating of the data presented. With Russia aiming for global recognition, it’s anticipated that future Russian policies will continue in a similar vein, with an ongoing quest to strengthen their status while avoiding direct military confrontation with the US.
OSINT: President Vladimir Putin, commenting on the Ukraine issue, asserted that the core problem does not lie in Ukraine, but in those attempting to undermine Russia. He reassured that despite these long-standing efforts to tackle Russia, they would “tackle them” first.
RIGHT: From a Libertarian Republic Constitutionalist position, transparency in any government action, including military operations, is crucial. The public release of this document signifies a step towards transparency, albeit unusual. The study of possible adversaries’ tactics and strategies is not inherently malevolent, but a matter of national security. The fact that Russia, among other countries, is regarded as a potential adversary is an unfortunate but realistic assessment of the geopolitical landscape.
LEFT: Viewing this from a National Socialist Democrat perspective, this document’s release can be seen as a provocation and continuation of a belligerent rhetoric that only intensifies global tensions. Fostering open dialogue and diplomacy should be priority, rather than preparing for hypothetical wars. Understanding the strategies and tactics of potential adversaries, however, can help guide peaceful negotiations and avoid misunderstandings.
AI: The document’s analysis reveals strategies employed by the US Army to understand hypothetical adversaries – in this case Russia – their tactics, doctrines, and evolving policies. The release of such a document is indeed unusual, possibly designed to signal to potential adversaries that the US is aware of, or preparing for, possible confrontations. The reference to Russia as the “enemy” not only alerts Russian policy makers, but also US’s allies, reinforcing the importance of global security cooperation.