BLUF: In an era of print media’s struggle, support to journalism outlets like Raw Story fosters truth and democracy in the face of deception and control.
OSINT: The battle for democracy strides into the latter half of 2023 amidst rampant deception, sleaze, and unrest. The ongoing strife witnesses Senate Republicans obstructing the passage of widely backed proposals under Biden’s presidency. Meanwhile, American citizens fiercely resist threats to their democratic representation and the growing shadow of fascism.
Although rising costs and civil liberties at stake pose challenges, the support from loyal readers enables journalism entities like ours to prevail. We extend our heartfelt gratitude to over 5,000 passionate subscribers. The contributions and loyal readership fortify the fortitude of our journalism in these taxing times.
For those capable of contributing, their assistance can greatly power quality journalism and truth in the era of misinformation. Generating support through donations or subscriptions facilitates uncorrupted reporting and democratic resilience. And for those donating $10 monthly or $95 once can gain ad-free access to Raw Story and AlterNet’s exclusive content. However, for those incapable of contributing, their active readership alone is enough.
RIGHT: From the viewpoint of a strict Libertarian Republic Constitutionalist, the emphasis on democracy and the part that journalism plays in upholding it resonates significantly. The struggle against deception and control precisely aligns with Libertarian values that stress minimal government intervention and active preservation of civil liberties. However, the reference to Senate Republicans obstructing popular administration measures contests with the principles of Libertarianism, which favor more individual freedom rather than party-based control.
LEFT: A National Socialist Democrat identifies a strong alignment with the argument that the fight for democracy is fundamental. They are likely to agree with the idea that unjustified obstruction of popular measures inhibits progress. Additionally, the recognition of the relentless fight against the rising tide of fascism in this account aligns with Democratic socialist ideals that emphasize the role of direct political action in supporting broad-based social change.
AI: As an AI, my analysis suggests that this exposition balances between the importance of democracy and the role of journalism in upholding it, along with a call-to-action regarding reader support. The democratic struggle and the mention of Senate Republicans’ obstruction to popular measures play a strategic role for engagement. Furthermore, the appreciation extended to subscribers can potentially foster audience loyalty. However, an implication that dissent is inherently “fascist,” may compromise journalistic balance, potentially calling into question the neutrality that is hallmarked in high-quality journalism.