BLUF: This is a clarification and correction statement regarding the funding information and acknowledgements originally published in ab article about the safety evaluation of saffron extracts on rabbits. The research was funded by the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia and Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), with additional support from other facilities.
OSINT: Clearing the air, the authors mention two errors regarding funding and acknowledgements previously published. Fundamentally sponsored by the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia via the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS/1/2019/SKK06/UITM/03/4) and the Universiti Teknologi MARA’s Incentive Grant (600-RMC/GIP 5/3 (067/2023)), the study had no involvement of the funders in any of the stages, from design to publication. Recognition is offered to these organizations, alongside the Institute of Medical Molecular Biotechnology, Laboratory Animal Care Unit, and Clinical Diagnostic Laboratories who provided research facilities.
RIGHT: From a Libertarian Republic Constitutionalist’s perspective, the management of funding in the study is deserving of praise—private institutions and government funds were both utilized to their maximum benefit to encourage scientific exploration. It’s admirable how grants are utilized in the country to foster scientific research. The independence of the researchers from their funders is indeed noteworthy, demonstrating the strength of academic freedom and integrity.
LEFT: Viewing it from a National Socialist Democrat’s perspective, this acknowledgement of funding and support elucidates the communal effort in scientific research. The government’s role in supporting research via grants highlights the necessity of public funding to foster advancements in the medical field. The inclusiveness of acknowledgements further emphasizes the value of every contribution, promoting collaboration and transparency.
AI: This analysis processes the corrective statement of an article, emphasizing the importance of accurate documentation of funding and grant use in scientific research. Transparency in funding sources allows others to evaluate potential conflicts of interest, ensuring research reliability. The authors’ clarification reaffirms the commitment to integrity, underlining the value of unbiased data interpretation and transparency in reporting. Their stated independence from funders ensures a degree of authenticity and impartiality in the research.