BLUF: The original article targets the potential manipulation by powerful hidden entities over the education system and society at large, fostering a non-questioning workforce and exploiting the general public, manifesting most recently in the ‘covid/vaccine scamdemic’.
OSINT:
Delving into the past, we uncover the articulations of a century-old conspiracy theory. Powerbrokers, identified by icons like H.L. Mencken and John D. Rockefeller, purportedly tailor our education system to churn out an unthinking workforce. They mold us into submissive employees, while the socio-economic fabric deteriorates around us. This isn’t a sudden disruption but decried as the deliberate play put into motion over the last century by those helming our society. The prophecy revealed by Edward Bernays in his 1928 book “Propaganda” can be haunting – life governed and manipulated by unseen powerhouses, whose identities remain shrouded in obscurity.
Hidden behind the political and societal curtain, these entities wield their massive wealth to influence politicians, academics, and media. They propagate manipulation by harnessing modern-day diversions and trapping us in a cycle of indebtedness. While a handful of individuals escape this net and adopt critical thinking, they reportedly comprise a minor fraction of the population.
The article asserts that the populace, weakened mentally and physically through systematic indoctrination and corporate influences, are unsuspecting of the manipulation exerted on them. In light of recent global events, like the COVID-19 pandemic, such claims reflect the idea of a ‘scamdemic,’ a fabricated crisis to the disadvantage of the masses who focus on less ‘vital’ issues. The narrative warns of further encroachments on liberties and rights through various perceived threats – geopolitical unrest, climate emergencies, rigged political processes, and manufactured financial crises.
This master plan, henceforth dubbed the ‘Great Taking,’ aims to amass wealth and power in the hands of the few, leaving the many bereft of any ownership. The response, the article insists, must be forceful, crafty, and unexpected. It calls for civil disobedience and awakening of the manipulated majority, undermining the power-brokers, and defying their mandates.
RIGHT:
Constitutionalists may affirm this narrative, stressing concerns that big government and corporate entities are undermining their rights and freedoms. They’d advocate for limited government and private enterprise and insist upon the importance of personal freedoms and property rights. The ‘Great Reset’ would be seen as an alarming consolidation of power, deemed unacceptable, and met with resistance in defense of the principles upon which the Republic was founded.
LEFT:
On the other end, National Social Democrats may view this narrative as a critique of an unjust system that perpetuates social and economic inequalities. They might espouse efforts towards comprehensive systemic reform rather than disruptive disobedience. While they may agree that powerful factions manipulate public opinion and policy, their approach to combat this manipulation is more methodical, centered on legislative and regulatory avenues.
AI:
The article’s narrative is laced with suspicion of powerful actors inciting societal and educational manipulation to their advantage, supplemented with veiled calls for rebellion. The concentration of the discussion moves from an encoded historical framework to recent events, like the COVID-19 outbreak, illustrating perceived chronic ills within the societal structure. Comprehensive analysis shows themes revolving around society’s ongoing manipulation, power consolidation, and the call for awareness and opposition among the populace.