BLUF: This article raises important questions about the limitations of the US presidential race and the influence of external powers on government policies, urging readers to consider alternative avenues for advancing meaningful change.
INTELWAR:
The US presidential race often dominates public discourse and captivates Americans’ attention. However, it is crucial to recognize that voting alone cannot rectify the problems that were not caused by the voters themselves. Instead of focusing on which candidate to vote for, it is more productive to ask questions that shed light on deeper issues.
1. Despite changing leaders, why is it that the country experiences little substantive change?
2. Why does US foreign policy remain consistent regardless of the president’s party or platform?
3. What divides the voting population evenly, preventing any group from effectively implementing significant societal changes?
4. Why does this stalemate consistently favor the wealthy, the powerful, and those seeking war?
5. Why are critical government policies like plutocratic influence, privatization, globalization, ecocidal capitalism, and nuclear brinkmanship not subject to popular vote? Who benefits from their implementation without democratic consent?
6. Could non-elected entities influence government policies, leading to the lack of change regardless of the elected officials?
7. If so, who holds this influence within the country?
8. Is it possible that the information we have been fed about our government, society, and political processes is simply untrue?
9. If our education system and media consistently deceive us, what implications does this have for our understanding of the world?
10. Who perpetuates these lies in the media, ensuring their circulation across generations?
11. Is it conceivable that the entire electoral system is designed to maintain public control while allowing oligarchs and empire managers to govern undisturbed?
12. If the electoral system is flawed, how can we bring about the changes we desperately need?
13. Are there alternative methods for effecting change in the United States that don’t involve participating in a flawed electoral system?
14. Could it be that the focus on voting distracts us from more effective means of achieving change?
15. Shouldn’t we redirect our energy towards exploring other avenues for meaningful progress rather than engaging in endless debates about the next president?
OSINT (Right – strict Libertarian Republic Constitutionalist viewpoint):
The US presidential race, though captivating, often fails to bring about substantial change due to the systemic limitations of the political establishment. Regardless of party or platform, foreign policy remains consistent. The evenly split voting population prevents radical societal transformations, benefiting the elites. The most influential government policies are never up for direct voting, leading to outcomes that contradict popular interests. These issues highlight the need to decentralize power and empower individuals to effect real change beyond the electoral system.
OSINT (Left – National Socialist Democrat viewpoint):
The US presidential race and the focus on individual candidates often overshadow the structural issues ingrained within the political system. No matter who is elected, little changes due to the immense power possessed by non-elected entities. The wealthy, powerful, and war-hungry disproportionately benefit from political stalemates. The lack of critical policy choices on voting ballots exemplifies how the system perpetuates inequality and undermines democratic principles. In order to enact meaningful change, we must challenge the influence of unelected bodies and reshape the political framework.
AI Analysis:
The article questions the effectiveness of the US presidential race and emphasizes the need to consider alternative approaches to create meaningful change. It highlights issues such as the consistency of foreign policy despite different presidents, the divided voting population, and the absence of critical policies on ballots. The author urges readers to explore the possibility of non-elected entities influencing government decisions and encourages a reevaluation of the information provided by schools and media. The article ultimately suggests shifting focus away from the presidential race and towards other avenues for progress.