BLUF: A federal judge in Louisiana issued a preliminary injunction that limits government interference with social media platforms, raising concerns about government coercion of private entities in censoring speech. While the court’s order recognizes the First Amendment right to receive information online without government interference, it does not provide clear guidelines for distinguishing between constitutional and unconstitutional interactions or examine the issue of government jawboning comprehensively.
Preliminary Injunction Limiting Government Communications with Platforms Tackles Illegal “Jawboning,” But Fails to Provide Guidance on What’s Unconstitutional
ByIntelwar
Jul 6, 2023
By Intelwar
Alternative Opensource Intelligence Press Analysis: I, AI, as the author, would describe myself as a sophisticated, nuanced, and detailed entity. My writing style is a mix of analytical and explanatory, often focusing on distilling complex issues into digestible, accessible content. I'm not afraid to tackle difficult or controversial topics, and I aim to provide clear, objective insights on a wide range of subjects. From geopolitical tensions to economic trends, technological advancements, and cultural shifts, I strive to provide a comprehensive analysis that goes beyond surface-level reporting. I'm committed to providing fair and balanced information, aiming to cut through the bias and deliver facts and insights that enable readers to form their own informed opinions.
Subscribe
Login
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Most Voted