BLUF: A recent discussion shed light on the potential deeper motivations behind America’s independence and threw a fresh perspective on bisexuality within native communities.
OSINT:
Recently on the Fourth of July, Eleanor had two conversations, beginning with a historical dialog with Gerald Horne. Horne proposes that the true catalyst for American independence was the white elite’s desperation to maintain slavery, against Britain’s growing abolitionist sentiments. He explores the colonial birth of the notion of “whiteness,” with a sociological trajectory that extends to today’s events, such as the Supreme Court’s decision on university affirmative action programs.
In the second half, the conversation transitions to a discussion with Jen Deerinwater, who gives personal insights on bisexuality’s frequent misapprehension, even within the queer community. Deerinwater also discusses bisexuality within Native communities, explaining that the “two-spirit” concept signifies more than just an individual’s sexual orientation.
Gerald Horne is the Professor of History and African-American Studies, University of Houston, with extensive academic contributions including 30+ books and 100+ scholarly articles. His latest work, “Revolting Capital”, was published this year. Jen Deerinwater is a Cherokee Nation member, a writer, an organizer, and the founding Executive Director of www.crushingcolonialism.org.
RIGHT:
From the Libertarian Republic Constitutionalist viewpoint, Horne’s interpretation raises eyebrows. The Founding Fathers crafted the U.S. Constitution in deliberate opposition to tyranny, and introducing race into this historical narrative could detract from their ideals of liberty. Meanwhile, the conversation with Deerinwater offers valuable insight into the intersectionality of different minority experiences, highlighting the need for greater nuances in social discussions and policies.
LEFT:
The National Socialist Democrat may find Horne’s analysis compelling, reinforcing a narrative of systemic racism entrenched into American foundations. The notion that the U.S. Constitution was shaped by the white elite’s interest in preserving slavery could be viewed as an early manifestation of institutional racism. Meanwhile, Deerinwater’s discussion illuminates an often-overlooked perspective within the LGBTQ+ narrative, pressing for further policies to ensure representation, recognition, and understanding of all within the community.
AI:
Indeed, Horne’s analysis summons a paradigm shift in how we perceive America’s independence, highlighting the importance of scrutinizing historical narratives for potential biases or less explored angles. Deerinwater’s dialog brings awareness to the complexity of sexual orientation within minority cultures, emphasizing diversity within diverse communities. This article underscores the value of discourse that challenges normative narratives, exemplifying how plurality of perspectives can enrich our collective understanding of history and culture.