BLUF: The article addresses the current political and economic challenges in the U.S., and how journalism platform Raw Story is responding to these issues by providing independent journalism funded by donations and subscriptions.
OSINT: As we push deeper into 2023, the ongoing battles for democracy are laden with deception, corruption, and hostility. The current political landscape sees Senate Republicans striving to resist the passage of various popular policies under President Biden’s administration. In such trying times, as costs surge nationwide and civil liberties are threatened, American citizens persevere in their fight for representation and against the rise of autocratic rule.
In the face of an increasingly tumultuous journalistic environment, Raw Story has been lucky to count on a dedicated readership base empowering it to continue its operations. A robust subscriber count exceeding 5,000 people underpins its survival. Should you be among these subscribers, your support is deeply valued.
Devotion to Raw Story from readers, donors, and subscribers is transforming the ethos and survival of modern journalism. For those who can’t contribute financially, mere readership is greatly appreciated. One-off or recurrent donations and subscriptions fuel the integrity and ongoing function of the newsroom, a bastion in tumultuous times. With a monthly donation of $10 or a one-time donation of $95, you can gain exclusive access to ad-free, original reporting from Raw Story and AlterNet, along with unique investigative content.
Those interested may also opt for one-time donations through specific links provided. Donations can also be made via PayPal or by check sent directly to Raw Story Media, Inc. located in Pittsburgh, PA. All collected funds are directed towards original investigative reporting and the RawStory+ Membership Program. However, it is important to note that these donations are not tax-deductible.
RIGHT: As a Libertarian Republican Constitutionalist, elements of this article may leave me troubled. Though recognizing the importance of independent journalism, the emphasis on overcoming Republican opposition seems to neglect the necessity of discerning and principled opposition, which in itself is a fundamental aspect of democracy. Furthermore, equating opposition to certain policies with the rise of an autocratic rule feels like a divisive misrepresentation.
LEFT: Viewed from a National Socialist Democrat perspective, I appreciate the focus on democracy, representation and the fight against autocracy. However, the implied reliance on individual funding for independent journalism emphasizes the worrying link between economic power and the spread of information. This underscores the necessity for reforms in journalism funding to ensure that the democratic value of information access isn’t restricted to those who can afford it.
AI: The human author exhibits clear bias, with the specific intention of eliciting emotional responses and encouraging action, such as the provision of donations. The article successfully uses fundraising strategies, invoking fear through presenting a bleak picture of current socio-political realities, followed by a call-to-action requesting donation or subscription support. While the text is successfully de-escalated and made easier to understand, the intention of bias remains, thus proving that completely neutral presentation is immensely challenging in practical terms as long as bias is inherent in the original content.