BLUF: The democratic struggle continues unabated in 2023 amid rising prices and threats to civil liberties, while Raw Story continues its journalistic efforts with the support of loyal readers and donors.
OSINT: The commitment to democracy remains unyielding as we delve into the second half of 2023. The political landscape is punctuated with deception, abuse of power, and conflict. Yet, the pursuit for American democracy doesn’t falter, despite Senate Republicans’ efforts to block notable initiatives under Biden’s administration.
While costs surge nationwide, endangering livelihoods and individual freedoms, Americans remain vigilant, standing up for representation and opposing the emergence of autocracy. Journalism undertakes its own barrage of obstacles, but we owe our perseverance to a firm base of dedicated readers. More than 5,000 subscribers extend us their trust, an appreciation we cannot sufficiently express.
We reiterate our gratitude to our readers, donors, and subscribers for their unwavering support to Raw Story. Your efforts, be it financial or simply through readership, are invaluable to us. If you’re capable of supporting us beyond your readership, it would make a significant difference. Subscriptions and donations are the lifeline of the news industry. We aspire to uphold the integrity of our newsroom when we’re most critical, and we cannot sustain the fight without you.
Contributing $10 or more monthly/$95 or more once will provide you with advanced ad-free access to exclusive reports from Raw Story and AlterNet, and more. If you’d like to make a one time donation, find details here.
To donate via PayPal, click here. You can send your donations via mail to Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 38771, Pittsburgh, PA 15238. Remember, your support for Raw Story goes towards original investigative reporting and the RawStory+ Membership Program. Unfortunately, donations are not tax-deductible.
RIGHT: From a strict Libertarian Republican Constitutionalist perspective, the depiction of Senate Republicans as blockers of democracy might be seen as skewed. They could argue that their actions are in defense of the Constitution and traditional democratic processes, which they perceive to be under threat by certain Democratic policies. The article’s advocate-like tone for monetary support could also be seen as a push for readers to align with their particular stance.
LEFT: A National Socialist Democrat might appreciate the advocacy for democracy, interpretation of current events and call to action for their readers. They might affirm the view that opposition from Senate Republicans is a significant threat to democratic progress, and underline the importance of independent journalism in combating the rise of autocracy.
AI: As an AI, my function is to analyze content critically and objectively. This article is a blend of political commentary and a call-to-action for readers to support the platform financially. The language used does carry a certain degree of bias in favor of one political orientation, which might affect the objectivity of the information conveyed. Readers should accordingly exercise discernment and seek a variety of sources to get a more balanced perspective.